Dennis Miller’s Bastard Son

September 21st, 2006

I am a decent man, a humble man. A non-violent man. It takes a lot to anger me. A people must be massacred, a revolution squashed, a puppy raped. Or apparently, Congress must pass a bill. You did NOT just groan right there. Fine, I don’t care. I’m all warmed up and I’m not stopping.

On Wednesday, the House voted 228-196 to require voters to show photo ID at the polling booth when they cast their ballot. This adds an unnecessary challenge to those not well-versed in the redundancy of government beuracracy and is bound to disenfranchise many voters from poor and urban areas. I could go on at length about the 22% of young black males in Wisconsin with no photo ID, or the other stringent requirements of the bill and why they will be hard for many to meet, or why they are unnecessary, but I’m going to trust that you are able to make that leap so I can go on with my rant.

Proposed under the guise of preventing voter fraud and keeping illegal immigrants from participating in elections, this bill was passed strictly along party lines. As there is no companion proposition in the Senate (set to adjourn in October, anyway), many speculate that this is merely a message to the immigrant hating right-wing base, one of those wink and smile type deals. "We still love you, we haven’t forgotten you." Like Trent Lott telling some good ol’ boys what a darn shame it was that we didn’t elect that aww shucks confederate Strom Thurmond president.

I hope this is the case. Because it is despicable, but only despicably symbolic and not devestatingly impactful. However, I have my doubts. A judge in Georgia struck down a similar measure that made it through both bodies of the state’s legislature. Clone bills have recently passed and subsequently been ruled unconstitutional by judges in Missouri, Indiana and Ohio. To me this seems like a large, coordinated attack. A two-pronged plan of getting out the right vote (as with the swath of state marriage amendments helping voter turnout last election cycle) and eventually suppressing the second-class citizen vote with added identification requirements.

History 101, which I’m sure you know: after the Civil War, southern whites systematically denied blacks the right to vote through poll taxes, grandfather clauses and literacy tests, and it tooks us 100 years to stop these practices. Some forty years after the 24th Amendment and Voting Rights Act, I certainly shouldn’t have to worry about any more "denying or abridging" and I sure as hell don’t want to see Jim Crow anywhere but in a history book.

If you think I’m being alarmist please say so, this post is already too long or I would supply more information. Whatever qualms I have about left-wing extremists, I’d prooobably let them babysit my kids. But I have serious worries about a party that fires up its faithful with hateful rhetoric and 700 mile walls. Oh yeah, did I mention that? They’re going to spend billions of dollars to wall off a big chunk of Mexico. Tired of the mariachi music, I guess. Oh won’t you be my neighbor?

Entry Filed under: Politics

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Mark Stamas  |  September 21st, 2006 at 8:19 pm

    Well I am so sheltered I don’t get the title or the misspellings.

    Yeah, its pretty obvious where this thing is going and I concur, not in a sustainable or beneficial direction.

    The sad thing is that all of these ridiculous posterings, panderings, radicalizations and dispensations result in a world that won’t support any of us, including them, they, the stupid ones, the fat and happy.

    Sometimes its just best to let the pot boil over, take up our positions, strap up and wait.

    This great country was founded on resistance and will survive on, yes indeed, resistance.

    Now start resisting.

  • 2. Mark Stamas  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    I am forced to comment on my comment since you won’t comment on my brilliant comment on your commentary.

    Imagine if you would for a short moment how it must feel to take up arms against your “government” and how stressful that must have been for our founders.

    They seem to have wanted to make sure that never again would a government as tyrannical be in a position of power over us US Citizens.

    They seem to have wanted to make sure that revolution would occur on a regular basis cleansing the system from the inexorable path to tyranny.

    They seem to have succeeded to do this through our Constitution and through regular representative changeovers “revolutions” of a political nature.

    We are three revolutions late and that much closer to tyranny.

  • 3. Mark Stamas  |  September 23rd, 2006 at 11:25 pm

    Well Devin.

    You should talk all that schooling going on pulls your focus away from self indulgent proselytizing.

    Get with it.

  • 4. Mark Stamas  |  September 24th, 2006 at 4:45 pm

    Why don’t you come over to the Off Every Day empire?

  • 5. Devin Castles  |  September 27th, 2006 at 3:50 am

    Sounds good. My stay here has been fun, but it is time to move on to greener pastures. I just hope my legions of readers will make the jump as well.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

September 2006
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Most Recent Posts