<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Then There Were Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/</link>
	<description>Political Impressions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stamas</title>
		<link>http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Stamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/#comment-891</guid>
		<description>Now you sound like one of the pundits you blasted in the last post!

Barack will win the Presidency, fate was against Hillary poor dear.

Oh, and Edwards? Edwards who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you sound like one of the pundits you blasted in the last post!</p>
<p>Barack will win the Presidency, fate was against Hillary poor dear.</p>
<p>Oh, and Edwards? Edwards who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devin</title>
		<link>http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/#comment-886</guid>
		<description>I feel exactly the same. With the discontent of the electorate becoming ever more apparent, I never heard a convincing argument from Edwards that his change of heart was anything more than a shifting of strategy to better reflect public sentiment. 

I know he cares about poor people, I'm relieved he cares about poor people. What I want to know is why didn't his votes in the senate reflect his concern for their well-being? Just saying you made a mistake doesn't make you humble and wonderful, explain why you made the mistake and why you've changed your mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel exactly the same. With the discontent of the electorate becoming ever more apparent, I never heard a convincing argument from Edwards that his change of heart was anything more than a shifting of strategy to better reflect public sentiment. </p>
<p>I know he cares about poor people, I&#8217;m relieved he cares about poor people. What I want to know is why didn&#8217;t his votes in the senate reflect his concern for their well-being? Just saying you made a mistake doesn&#8217;t make you humble and wonderful, explain why you made the mistake and why you&#8217;ve changed your mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fittoprint.offeveryday.com/2008/01/30/and-then-there-were-two/#comment-885</guid>
		<description>i wonder if matt stoller was the guy i saw on cnn or msnbc soon after mr. edwards spoke from the ninth district in new orleans today to withdraw.  the guy was titled "democratic strategist" but i didn't get the name with all the froofraw running under the screen.  

what interested me was his explanation for why folks thought mr. edwards' "face did not match his rhetoric."  he said the rhetoric did not match what people expected from him after the last campaign, being angrier now.  i had wondered exactly that (again, for the fifth time) as i watched today's withdrawal.  i never saw him explain what made his shift from 2004 to his rousing, confrontational rhetoric of 2008 understandable or believable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder if matt stoller was the guy i saw on cnn or msnbc soon after mr. edwards spoke from the ninth district in new orleans today to withdraw.  the guy was titled &#8220;democratic strategist&#8221; but i didn&#8217;t get the name with all the froofraw running under the screen.  </p>
<p>what interested me was his explanation for why folks thought mr. edwards&#8217; &#8220;face did not match his rhetoric.&#8221;  he said the rhetoric did not match what people expected from him after the last campaign, being angrier now.  i had wondered exactly that (again, for the fifth time) as i watched today&#8217;s withdrawal.  i never saw him explain what made his shift from 2004 to his rousing, confrontational rhetoric of 2008 understandable or believable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
